mih has suggested that the Supreme Court should reconsider the constitutionality of Loving v. Virginia. Others have noted its omission in yesterday’s concurring opinion from Clarence Thomas.
https://news.yahoo.com/obergefell-plaintiff-scotus-same-sex-055445239.html
In a “what if” world, Loving v. Virginia is overturned, and Clarence Thomas’ marriage would be declared illegal. Then returning to the America of the 1800’s, as was done in the abortion opinion, Clarence will be called “boy” and become Ginni’s property. MAGA success!
So true. So self-serving. What a blind spot. R is the party of hypocrisy for sure. I feel like that are an endless stream of “Conservatives” that denounce X, then are shown to be guilty of X. People just don’t want to see.