Fully Insured?

Ever hear of balance billing? It’s a game that health care providers and insurance companies play with their customers caught in the middle, and it’s getting a lot of attention in California. The idea is insurance companies reimburse only the amount that Medicare pays for a given service, which is sometimes about 60% of the actual cost, and the patients are billed for the difference. Combined with the free care that many hospitals provide to uninsured emergency room walk-ins, it’s no wonder health care providers want fully insured patients to be fully insured.

I make my living working at a company that depends upon the viability of hospitals. Carol worked at two suburban Boston hospitals that closed. Shut down and gone. So there’s a reason for hospital administrators to insist upon full reimbursement for services.

Until and unless there’s national health in the United States, it’s my expectation that at some point “fully insured” will mean having a sizable deductible. Everybody will pay something like the first $1000 annually for individual coverage and $2500 for a family. These amounts would be adjusted over a period of time until they’re doubled. The elderly, diabetics and pregnant women would go through that very quickly, of course, but many people would be paying for all of their routine care.

The problem is, of course, that some people won’t go to the doctor and they’ll end up in emergency rooms anyway. But by shifting the financial burden of primary care to consumers, the hope would be that premiums would drop enough that more people could be covered for cancer and heart attacks. And no more of that pre-existing condition nonsense. Health care as we know it in America would be gone, but I just don’t see how else the system can manage.

And let’s be honest with ourselves. Many health problems are caused by eating, drinking, smoking, and lack of exercise.

You’ve Been Tubed

The list of everything you’ve ever watched on YouTube will soon be in the hands of Viacom. This is ridiculous.

What is Viacom going to find people were watching that belongs to them? Mostly Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert, and that won’t be news to them. You’d think those guys could put some pressure on the suits and tell them to lay off. Deal with reality and find a way to make it pay without making the fans feel like crooks.

The Great Jun-Nov Waste

How can anybody not already be sure whether they’re voting for McCain or Obama in November? Millions of dollars will go to TV networks and stations, and I think it’s a waste of money, because everything that everybody needs to know to make a decision is already known, and from here on out all there will be are personal attacks.

I’m appalled by the Hillary supporters who are so strident in their refusal to vote for Obama. They’re negligent if they don’t vote, and those who vote for McCain are outright fools, because they’ll be voting against their own interests and further undermining the Democratic Party.

After Hillary’s divisive campaign I don’t want to see her as Obama’s running mate. If I were Obama I’d offer Secretary of State to Hillary and caution her to think before she refuses. And if she balked anyway and insisted on VP, I’d knock the offer down to Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, take it or leave it.

If Hillary does end up on the ticket, then I will think that Obama isn’t perhaps as tough and willing to play hard ball as he should be, but I certainly wouldn’t vote for McCain. I can’t understand why he’s viewed in polls as being better equipped to handle Iraq. With 80% of Americans unhappy with the direction of the country, why vote for somebody who wants to keep things the way they are?

Slippery Slope

I’m interested in hearing what conclusions come from the various panel hearings in Congress, of the effect that speculators are having on the price of oil. Oil being a worldwide commodity, combined with rising demand in China, and the weak dollar, are factors of course. But the rise being so fast and so steep has me concluding that after the Dot Com bubble burst the money went into real estate, and after that collapsed it’s now in oil.

Hajdu, Don’t Make It Bad


Peanuts, June 22, 1952

Comic books, like the movies, were under attack in the 1950’s. Movie people were accused of being communists, and comic book people were accused of causing juvenile delinquency. A book by David Hajdu, called The Ten-Cent Plague: The Great Comic-Book Scare and How It Changed America, gives some serious thought to what happened and how it influenced later events beyond comic books themselves. Stephen Colbert, who’s obviously a comic book fan, interviewed Hajdu a couple of weeks ago.

[flv:/Video/2008/JUN/ColbertHajdu.flv 440 330]

There’s irony in the “TV 14” rating that’s so prominent during Colbert’s introduction. It’s almost like the Comics Code Authority seal that appeared on comic books after the big scare. Oh no! How did that commercial get left at the end of the interview?

EC Comics publisher William Gaines did a lousy job testifying before the Senate Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency in 1954. His entire testimony is at this link. He should have emphasized that his horror comics were inspired by radio shows such as Inner Sanctum, Lights Out, and The Whistler. But there was probably no defense against the public sentiment of the day. In a way, losing the comic book business was the best thing that could have happened to Gaines, because he was left with MAD Magazine, which was far more subversive and influential anyway, and it ended up being vastly more successful.

[flv:/Video/2008/JUN/WilliamGaines.flv 440 330]