I feel strongly that McCain should not be President. For starters, he’s too old. Reagan is held up as a refutation of age as being a qualification, but history has revealed that Reagan really wasn’t up to the job for most of his second term.
Second, I think McCain isn’t intellectually engaged on a broad range of issues, and at his age he’s not about to change. And on the issues that do interest him he’s far from being a master of detail. The one thing he jumped all over, and is his sole claim to being a “maverick” who stands up to Bush, was the issue of torture. And that’s only because it happened to him and he can personally relate to it.
McCain strikes me as being ready to kick back and retire, and completely unprepared to tackle the most difficult set of problems any President in recent history has faced. I can’t understand why, except for reasons of ego, he wants to be President, because his energy level just isn’t there.
Lastly, McCain is on record as wanting to continue the occupation of Iraq. He wants to relive Vietnam through Iraq and come up with a different ending. McCain believes Vietnam could have been “won,” if only we hadn’t lost our will. Which is a total fantasy. And that’s the crux of my complaint about McCain. Combined with the fact that I will never vote for a Republican candidate for any office, ever again, because of the actions of the delusional, self-interested, lying and hypocritical Neocons.
So as a registered Democrat, that leaves me with Hillary Clinton and Obama, and Hillary has already won Massachusetts. Ya know how Hillary is claiming her time as First Lady provided applicable experience to govern the country? If she’s going to say that as the President’s spouse she was involved with running the country, then I think she should assure us that Bill, as the President’s spouse, will be involved with running the country.
I was more for Hillary some months back, but like many people the more I saw of her and Obama, the more I preferred Obama. If Hillary had voted with Ted Kennedy in October 2002, against using force in Iraq, I would vote for her. If she assured us that Bill would be active in setting policy, I would vote for her. But she can’t take her vote back, nor can she even hint that she can’t do it alone, without her husband’s input.
I realize Obama wasn’t in the U.S. Senate during the vote to authorize force, so his stated opposition to the invasion in Iraq counts for not very much, but I nevertheless feel he’s our best chance to get out of there sooner, rather than later. I don’t want to vote again for a candidate, as I did with Kerry, who was either tricked by George Bush, or knew the truth and was afraid of opposing Bush. I want a fresh start, and Obama is it.