Category: Comic Books

Happy Birthday, Joe Sinnott!

Marvel Comics art legend Joltin’ Joe Sinnott is 85 today. Hover over the picture to see Joe “back in the day,” as he likes to say. The thing about Joe is, looking at the artwork he does now, there’s no “back in the day” about it, because it’s as perfect as ever.

I didn’t start collecting comic books until early 1966, after the Batman TV show premiered, so I’d missed a lot of great Sixties issues and I really appreciated comics with reprints (although later I was dismayed to learn the artists and writers received no reprint royalties). Marvel Tales #10, September ’67, reprinted the Thor story from Journey into Mystery #92, May ’63. That was the first time I saw art that Joe had both penciled and inked. From that I was able to get a better appreciation for what Joe did to give Jack Kirby’s forceful Fantastic Four art such an attractive and clean appearance.

For much better printing quality than this scan from Marvel Tales #10, I recommended The Mighty Thor Omnibus, Vol. 1, which I was happy to get for my birthday. I don’t know how much of the book was taken from original art, but this particular story sure appears as though it was.

Joe will be appearing at the Albany Comic Con in two weeks, Sunday, October 30, and you can be sure Denro and I will be there!

Irony as far as the eye can see?

David Barsalou, creator of the groundbreaking and exhaustive Deconstructing Lichtenstein project, wrote to point out another art swipe by Roy Lichtenstein that’s up for auction. I can see the whole room … and there’s nobody in it! is expected to fetch upwards of $45 million!

A gallery owner is quoted in the Bloomberg article at the link above, saying, “It epitomizes Roy’s use of irony, which is the most important theme throughout his work.” Irony, she says? It’s only ironic that the painting is worth so much money, because it’s a direct swipe from a Steve Roper comic strip panel drawn by William Overgard. Heck, it’s only 4×4 feet, and you’d think spending that much money would rate a wall-sized canvas.

Barsalou has some instructive links about the piece here and here. As you can see, the swipe was spotted by William Overgard, who wrote to Time magazine and asked, with some irony, “Very flattering…I think?” Not really. Notice how Lichtenstein changed the hand? Overgard’s original looks correct — you can tell it’s a thumb — but Roy got it wrong, so it looks like an index finger in the wrong place. Intentional artistic license? Nah, he couldn’t draw.

King Kirby’s family loses claim to legacy

Well, this is disappointing. The family of Jack Kirby, the most powerful single creative force comic books will ever have, has lost their suit to obtain the copyrights of the characters that populate the Marvel Entertainment empire.

It’s a sad state of affairs that a settlement couldn’t be reached, where Kirby’s estate gets a share of the proceeds from the movies that are doing so well. It’s saddens me there’s so much bad blood between the Kirbys and Stan Lee, and also between Lee and Steve Ditko. I love everything these guys did, and I’m not comfortable taking sides, but the anti-Stan sentiment that has developed bothers me. Just as the Beatles did their best work together, so did Jack and Steve when working with Stan. Kirby saw the possibilities of his creations as major media entertainment, but Stan deserves credit for making it happen. I just wish the Kirbys could cash in the success of the franchise. Even better would be an alternate reality fantasy where Jack and Stan sued together as co-creators, as Siegel and Shuster did for Superman.

P.S. I haven’t seen the Captain America movie yet, so I don’t know who gets credit for the character. With Jack Kirby, Joe Simon co-created Cap, and he had his own lawsuit. Simon says (sorry, couldn’t resist), “I’ve been happy with the results of our various legal entanglements, and my relationship with Marvel is very good these days.”

P.P.S. Joe Sinnott submitted a statement to the court in March. It’s at this link.