Category: Politics, Religion & Money

1. Who attacked the United States on September 11, 2001?
Osama bin Laden and Al Qaida
2. Did the United States have a good chance at capturing Osama bin Laden?
Yes, in December, 2001, in Tora Bora, Afghanistan.
3. Has the United States captured Osama bin Laden?
No.
4. Did Saddam Hussein and Iraq have any involvement with September 11, 2001 or Osama bin Laden?
No.
5. What justification was given by President Bush for invading Iraq?
Saddam Hussein was in possession of lethal weapons that represented an imminent, large scale threat.
6. Did Saddam Hussein have any such weapons?
No.

None of these facts are in dispute, are they? And they were all known before the election of 2004, were they not? Just checking.

In today’s NYTimes…

WASHINGTON, Oct. 10 — The Marine Corps is pressing to remove its forces from Iraq and to send marines instead to Afghanistan, to take over the leading role in combat there, according to senior military and Pentagon officials.

…and this is what I said a year ago.

We’ve got to get out of there. Now. It would be far cheaper and safer to simply give Iraq the money it needs to rebuild. Send the National Guard home where it belongs, let half of the regular Army rest, and redeploy the other half to Afghanistan. I’m no military strategist, but this is obvious.

If this was obvious to me a whole year ago, with no military experience whatsoever, what took the experts so long to start coming around to the same conclusion?